home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder | Mammahood


 


 


« movement | main | uh-huh »

KM made easy

from The Virtues of Chitchat - Making I.T. Work - CIO Magazine May 15,2004

"the blogging phenomenon has intriguingly useful implications for IT. I have to ask myself: Why wouldn't it make sense for an IT project manager to post a blog—or "plog" (project log)—to keep her team and its constituents up-to-date on project issues and concerns? Is it inherently inappropriate for an individual to post constructive observations about a project's progress? IT organizations that can effectively use blogs as managerial tools (or communication resources) are probably development environments that take both people and their ideas seriously. "

lots to ponder in this article. one is the funny tone of shock- how can they let employees to opening say what they think!" but far more interesting is contemplating how a blog can be so much more. When MT came out their pricing notice, a number of arrogant souls said, hey just go back to notepad and ftp. But the reality is, even for folks for whom those tools are sufficient, blogging is just easier. And easy means everything you know and think is more likely to make it into documentation-- for good and for bad.

A critical problem is getting people at the end of a project ot write out documentation. But inline at eh time documentation si both easier and more useful.

I would question though, if blogs (or plogs if you wish) are the right tool. i'd say a wiki, with it's emphasis on topic over chronological ordering is more useful.

Still, over all I think it's an excellent trend, one smart companies should take advantage of. Blogs make post-mortems easy, reveal problems earlier, and make it more likely people will take the time to write down at least some of the logic behind decisions, plus it helps mitigate the bus-factor.

all good.

Posted at May 17, 2004 11:50 AM


Comments

 

For something like this, when you want workers inside a company to particpate in a project, is it best to dumb down the interface to a minimalist set of features? We've been having this argument, internally, for months. Edward Tufte says you should trust the intelligence of the user and offer pages with broad ranges of options, but dealing with users seems to indicate the opposite - they all want a simpler interface.

Anyone who wants to login to this site, please do so:

http://publicpen.com/designer/
username: designer
password: designer123

The link to login is in the lower right column.

Any strong feelings about this? Less options? Rework the same options so they are more clear?

Posted by Lawrence Krubner at June 2, 2004 10:24 PM


~~~

Just be surfing around in net. I definitely fpund a very informal place with a lot of good stuff for everybody. I will
certainly visit your site again sometime. Really good work.

Posted by Shelly Mirage at October 21, 2004 1:21 AM


~~~



Post a comment
*Name:


*Email Address:


URL:


Remember me?

Comments:

bold italic underline link


posting can be slow; please wait a few seconds before hitting the button again.

The extra-fine print
wording stolen by the more-eloquent-than-I kottke
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.
Hearty discussion and unpopular viewpoints are welcome, but please keep comments on-topic and *civil*. Flaming, trolling, and ass-kissing comments are discouraged and may be deleted.
All comments, suggestions, bug reports, etc. related to the comments system should be directed to me.


mail entry to a friend

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




« movement | main | uh-huh »

 

 

 

home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder | Mammahood