home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder


 


 


« Signage junkies delight once more | main | tallness »

peter's looking....

From a new Semantics column on Ambient Findability

"Having achieved this network nirvana, the question is inevitable: what's next? For an information architect with library roots, the answer is obvious: ambient findability.

I want to be able to find anything, anywhere, anytime."

Me too! I want to by lying in my hammock, gazing at the stars and be able to yell out, 'When were dogs first domesticated?" and have an answer.

Posted at August 29, 2002 11:12 AM


Comments

 

This would be a tradgedy. Science advances not because of the answers to the questions it raises, but because of the extra questions encountered along the way.

(c.v. reference interview)

Posted by Eric Scheid at August 29, 2002 04:35 PM


~~~

I dont' know as I agree-- why should we waste our time answering the same questions over and over again. Perhaps we can next build on the wisdom of others to advance to the next level... once we learn what is known.

Posted by christina at August 29, 2002 10:00 PM


~~~

My point is that sometimes it's better to not waste any time answering the question, not even a second. Don't answer the question. This is not the question you are seeking .

The conceit I see is thinking that users know what they want, that they are somehow perfectly logical and sensible. Too many easy answers can be a bad thing for learning and thinking. Better to maintain the frame of mind of questioning and doubt.

I would be more interested in pervasive technology that lets us explore relationships between things, that recognises information not as atomic units to be plugged-and-played but rather as only having meaning within relationships and networks.

Far better to accumulate a knowledge of the inter-relationships and inter-play, the ecologies of the information, than to simply accumulate facts and datums and opinions.

Posted by Eric Scheid at August 30, 2002 02:16 AM


~~~

Have to agree with Eric. Also take it one step further, what kinds of questions are being asked? Are those questions just symptoms of a bigger problem? Is anyone stepping back to really think of the bigger question? Yes having the tools available for me to make the inter-relationships are great, but at the expense of info overload since you aren't quite sure if they are the right questions? I hope this makes sense...

Posted by Madonnalisa at August 30, 2002 01:54 PM


~~~

Mmmmmm, and notice how sometimes the framing of a good question can require a lot more imagination and neural horsepower, than it takes to answer it...

Posted by FionaMK at September 6, 2002 12:40 AM


~~~

Steve Krug titled his book on usability "Don't Make Me Think."

I guess a book on findability would be called "Don't Make Me Search"!

Seriously though, I think findability is going to dominate the next phase of the web's development.

-- Michael from Mediajunk

Posted by Michael Heraghty at September 23, 2003 10:16 AM


~~~



Post a comment
*Name:


*Email Address:


URL:


Remember me?

Comments:

bold italic underline link


posting can be slow; please wait a few seconds before hitting the button again.

The extra-fine print
wording stolen by the more-eloquent-than-I kottke
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.
Hearty discussion and unpopular viewpoints are welcome, but please keep comments on-topic and *civil*. Flaming, trolling, and ass-kissing comments are discouraged and may be deleted.
All comments, suggestions, bug reports, etc. related to the comments system should be directed to me.


mail entry to a friend

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




« Signage junkies delight once more | main | tallness »

 

 

 

home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder