« Charette | main | is this legal? is this right? »
For some times now I've been saying information wants to be free, but people like to be paid. Print VersionThe Seven Deadly Sins of Free Content: Spears & Daggers is one of the most passionate arguments against free content.
Boxes and Arrows is still free. I suppose our sin is pride, so we ignore our costs and keep spitting the dang thing out.
Speaking of free content, how have I missed blogcritics for so long. I dig it.
An a similar note, just read a Forrester Report on the spending and Internet habits of the wealthy. One of the analysis reported that the wealthy would more than likely pay for content and some already do...
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money."
In my experience those that write the most worthwhile reading do it because they love it. They only charge because hey! we all have to eat between working. ;)
I run a hobby site about creative writing but it gets updated very infrequently because of my intense lack of time. If I charged for this content I would be accountable to my paying readers. What happens when I get a choice of delivering content on my hobby site to satisfy the demands of my paying readers or doing my 9-5 (ha! 8-8 more like it) job?
There's always space for free content on the web. If there wasn't, we wouldn't have had the web in the first place.
I run a hobby site about creative writing but I never have the time to update it frequently. If I charged for the content I would have to make the choice between being answerable to my paying readers or sitting down and doing my 9-5 (ha! more like 8-8) job.
We would never have had the web in the first place if it wasn't for free content.
I run a hobby site about creative writing but I never have the time to update it frequently. If I charged for the content I would have to make the choice between being answerable to my paying readers or sitting down and doing my 9-5 (ha! more like 8-8) job.
We would never have had the web in the first place if it wasn't for free content.