home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder


 


 


« It takes so little... | main | culture, jakob and flash »

badpractices.com

looks like I've found a partner in crime to work on badpractices.com. Right now we're trying to think up general catagories for it such as evil banners, rude customer services, confusing navigation, flash abuse... what can you think of that would make good galleries of bad practices?

Posted at August 01, 2001 03:00 PM


Comments

 

I'm not sure what category you'd put this under? Maybe a heuristic: User control and freedom?

Posted by Chad Lundgren at August 1, 2001 04:16 PM


~~~

personally i think teeny type could almost be a category of its own...

Posted by Christina at August 1, 2001 05:00 PM


~~~

Sigh.

Posted by Adam at August 1, 2001 08:02 PM


~~~

Drives me up the wall. You would think we would know better by now....

Posted by ralph at August 1, 2001 08:47 PM


~~~

And to make it even worse, a good percentage of sites that do this also end up telling people they don't meet the requirements even if they do, because of botched Javascript sniffer code.

Posted by charles at August 1, 2001 09:22 PM


~~~

3. "Untitled Document" as the page title.

Posted by Paul Nattress at August 2, 2001 01:05 AM


~~~

badpractices.com is a huge task! Have you considered limiting the scope, to say, usability but not coding practices?

Posted by Victor at August 2, 2001 07:30 AM


~~~

but you do suggest some good metacategories: bad design, bad usability, bad coding, bad client, bad vendor...

Posted by christina at August 2, 2001 07:51 AM


~~~

I certainly have a collection of pet peeves to contribute (complete with screenshots), but I would personally find goodpractices.com more helpful. I think that as a group we IA/Usability types are far too critical; it's much easier to critique than to praise (let alone create), and we could all do with fewer "grr"s and more "nice job"s.

Posted by Nadav at August 2, 2001 10:16 AM


~~~

http://www.baddesigns.com/

Posted by ct at August 2, 2001 12:04 PM


~~~

Halp!!

Posted by ilovedallas at August 3, 2001 03:34 PM


~~~

If you release a URL as part of a mailer or an ad, maybe the website should payoff that collateral in some small way.Example one: Sony has covered Montgomery station with ads for a new Vaio laptop, the R505. When you go the page in the ads, sony.com/vaio/ there is no immediate link between the print ad and the website. Oh, there's an "ad" in the lower right corner: "now save $500 on select R505 notebooks," but that's the only visible connexion.Example two: I just got my bill from SprintPCS. They announced a new, simplified invoice. However, to switch to that new format, I have to go to the Sprint site and change some preference in my customer information. Fine. Following the steps listed in the mailer, I log on, click on "My Services" and when the page loads, look for "Bill Type". Although there are a plethora of services that I can add to my service (for which Sprint will be me), there's nothing even vaguely reminiscent of "Bill Type". You could also include the fact that using their site is the only way of changing this preference. A lot of companies are pushing customers to websites that are not equipped to meet those customer's needs.

Posted by David at August 3, 2001 06:40 PM


~~~

This discussion inspired me to finish the FTSE 100 Usability Awards

Posted by tom smith at August 5, 2001 12:03 PM


~~~

I'm quite with you, I do think bestpractices are important to concentrate on, but goodpractices.com is taken *and* I think people enjoy putting up offenders and a badpractices.com will attract more activity. Also, i'd like to suggest a format for it that will cause people who put up offenders to offer up solutions on how it could have been a good practice instead, rather than just griping for giggles. (gripingforgiggles.com might have been fun also!)

Posted by christina at August 6, 2001 07:59 AM


~~~

speaking of partner in crime, jenifer has posted a teensy survey that I hope you will be kind enough to take. 7 questions! easy!

Posted by Christina at August 6, 2001 11:24 AM


~~~

And he talks at lots of conferences, so a lot of designers hear him and do what he says.

Posted by martha at August 7, 2001 02:25 PM


~~~

Zeldman and I fought about this just this friday, at web design 01, and I still don't agree that pixels are the way to go. However, Shawn convinced him he was making his very valable information unavailable to people who could use it, and he said he would look at removing the size definition altogether. he made the very fine point that if he did allow his page to becoem "ugly" by increasign the size, many designers would not longer listen to him. We three discussed the use of a "large type version" which i hope he will implement. i appreciate it hugely on IHT.

Posted by christina at August 7, 2001 03:59 PM


~~~

As much as I like Zeldman and what he has to say, I don't think his site's font size is what makes web designers listen to him - it's his excellent writing style, laid-back manner of presenting at conferences, and valuable information.

Posted by martha at August 8, 2001 10:15 AM


~~~

how bout a complete category dedicated to everything jacob says. I have idiotic stakeholders all over me telling me how to do my job on a bad rainy day just because they read about what jake had to say! Phew... sorry bout that.

Posted by Alainswine at August 31, 2001 01:18 PM


~~~

i need help getting an address for a cell phone number. It will be worth your time$$$$.

Posted by tony draper at September 14, 2001 10:46 AM


~~~



Post a comment
*Name:


*Email Address:


URL:


Remember me?

Comments:

bold italic underline link


posting can be slow; please wait a few seconds before hitting the button again.

The extra-fine print
wording stolen by the more-eloquent-than-I kottke
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.
Hearty discussion and unpopular viewpoints are welcome, but please keep comments on-topic and *civil*. Flaming, trolling, and ass-kissing comments are discouraged and may be deleted.
All comments, suggestions, bug reports, etc. related to the comments system should be directed to me.


mail entry to a friend

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




« It takes so little... | main | culture, jakob and flash »

 

 

 

home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder